The Emerging Crisis in Critical Thinking:

This article first appeared in Psychology Today, March 21, 2017, written by Stephen Camarata.

Admittedly this article is already over a year old. However, many of Dr. Stephen Camarata's arguments are still presented today as an explanation for a perceived lack of not only critical thinking but also a reduction in grit and resilience amongst Millennials. 

What drew me into this particular article was the discussion of the physical effects of learning methods adopted in the 90s. In essence, have parents hardwired their children to be incapable of critical thought.

The article does a precise job of posing this question but strays in its attempt to formulate a complete answer. It begins by looking at teaching/learning methods that stressed rote memorization and recall but then forays into a criticism of helicopter parenting and not allowing children to fail. 

I think there is goodness in the debate pertaining to this topic and food for thought found in the article for parents contemplating how to best complement their children’s education while enhancing critical thinking. As with most brief articles, it doesn’t provide a depth of answers, but then again, maybe applying some critical thought is the point.

Let the Battle Commence: Leader and Expert or Leader vs Expert?

The top article first appeared in Forbes, March 9, 2012, written by Josh BersinThe bottom article first appeared in Forbes, March 28, 2017, written by Jenn Lofgren.

Inside my head, an idea has been bouncing around for the past couple of weeks, professionals vs. experts.  This thought experiment has generated such mental gymnastics for the GATCT team that this subject matter, in one form or another, will be featured in an upcoming article.  In the meantime, the Greater Applications co-creator, Justin Witty unearthed these two articles.  One magazine, two separate pieces, two opposing points of view.  The first article certainly has a specific organizational demographic in mind while the second is more of for the generalists.

Nevertheless, this should not detract from the quagmire that sits before us.  Leader and expert or leader vs. expert?  Does the combination matter, if so what is the right formula, if not then why do most organizations spend so much time defining, describing or explaining themselves as one, the other, or both?  Leader and expert are not synonymous terms, yet one argument suggests that both topics are required for success while another indicates the separation of the two ideas.  As much as the phrase "it depends" would be straightforward, this problem set deserves much greater application.  Good news, both articles are short and get right to the point so digesting both ideas and beginning your own thought dissection will be easy.  We would like to hear from each of you so please, leave your thoughts in the comments section below.  Enjoy!

Can Intellectuals Wear Muddy Boots?

This article first appeared on From The Green Notebook, October 10, 2016.  

In Joe Byerly's 2016 blog post, "Can Intellectuals Wear Muddy Boots," he brings to light a topic, that today in 2018 continues to permeate inside talent management decisions, a perceived difference between the intellectual and the "muddy boots" leader.  This topic, forever old, remains a field of promise for some, a battleground for others, and Fiddler's Green for the rest.  As illustrated by the blog's citation, a letter from then COL Arthur L. Wagner (April 28, 1904), the idea that theory, intellectual pursuits, and communication of those ideas within the profession of arms are not always looked upon with eagerness, interest or usefulness.  Should not this perception go the way of once used smoke signals and muzzleloading muskets?  We can not preach the need for a warrior-scholar and then amputate the scholar. 

Source: From the Green Notebook

Source: From the Green Notebook

The Best Talkers May Not Be Your Best Performers

This article first appeared on the Forbes website, August 14, 2018.  Written by Jeff Hyman

Presented by, contributing editor, Paul Smith:

At a recent professional military education course, a senior leader called on two officers from the gathered crowd and proceeded to attempt to demonstrate how extroverts made better officers than introverts. To the credit of the introvert, they refused to let the conversation move in only one direction and countered the senior officer's initial argument regarding their perception of extrovert dominance in the field of military leadership. 

This article addresses the introvert stereotype and makes a convincing argument for leaders and managers to overcome any biases they might have regarding these personality traits. 

Looking to hear from the GATCT crowd about their approaches to talent management regarding introverts and extroverts.

Source: FREEOPENPIX

Process….Not Program: Leader Development is a Process

This article first appeared on The Company Leader, August 11, 2018.

Presented by, contributing editor, Paul Smith:

There are lots of discussions focused on professional development, but at times the focus is on the program and not an understanding of the process. This article, while military oriented, does a great job of aligning vision, values, and mission while calling for critical thought in the application of the process.